Simso Past Paper — Editor's Choice

Prepared for students and instructors who need a quick‑reference guide to the most common exam material surrounding the SIMSO (Simple Multiprocessor Scheduling Simulator) tool. 1. What is SIMSO? | Feature | Description | |---------|-------------| | Purpose | A lightweight, open‑source Python‑based simulator used to model and evaluate real‑time scheduling algorithms on uniprocessor and multiprocessor platforms. | | Key Modules | simso.core (event engine), simso.scheduler (algorithm implementations), simso.visualizer (Gantt charts, statistics). | | Typical Use‑Cases | • Academic labs for Operating‑Systems / Real‑Time Systems courses. • Research prototyping of novel scheduling policies. • Benchmarking of task sets (periodic, aperiodic, sporadic). | | Supported Algorithms | Fixed‑Priority (Rate‑Monotonic, Deadline‑Monotonic), EDF, PFair, LLF, Global/Partitioned variants, custom user‑defined policies. | | Input/Output | • XML task‑set description (period, WCET, deadline, offset). • JSON configuration for platform (CPU count, speed‑scaling). • CSV/HTML reports, Gantt visualisations. |

Primary reference : – https://github.com/simso/simso 2. Why Past‑Paper Material Matters | Goal | How Past Papers Help | |------|----------------------| | Conceptual mastery | Repeated exposure to classic scheduling theory questions (e.g., utilization bounds, feasibility tests). | | Tool fluency | Typical lab‑style tasks: “Run the EDF scheduler on the given task set and interpret the resulting schedule.” | | Exam strategy | Identifying the weight given to theory vs. practical simulation, spotting “trick” wording (e.g., “preemptive vs. non‑preemptive”). | | Time‑management | Knowing how long a full‑simulation question takes (≈12‑15 min) vs. a short‑answer proof (≈5 min). | 3. Typical Structure of SIMSO‑Related Exam Papers | Section | Typical Marks | Sample Prompt | |---------|---------------|----------------| | A. Theory (30‑40 %) | 10‑20 pts | Derive the Liu & Layland utilization bound for n periodic tasks and explain its relevance to the Rate‑Monotonic (RM) scheduler. | | B. Short‑Answer / Proof (20‑30 %) | 5‑10 pts | Show whether a task set T1(4,10), T2(2,5) is schedulable under EDF on a uniprocessor. | | C. Simulation Setup (10‑15 %) | 5 pts | Write the XML snippet that defines a sporadic task with period 20 ms, WCET 3 ms, deadline 15 ms, and offset 0. | | D. Lab‑Style Simulation (30‑40 %) | 15‑20 pts | Using SIMSO, run a Global EDF schedule on a 2‑core platform for the task set given. Submit the generated Gantt chart and compute the total missed‑deadline count. | | E. Interpretation / Discussion (10‑15 %) | 5‑10 pts | Explain why the Global EDF schedule in part D exhibits “priority inversion” and propose a mitigation technique. | 4. Analysis of the Last 5 Years of Past Papers (University‑Level) | Year | Number of SIMSO Questions | Dominant Topics | Notable “Trick” Items | |------|----------------------------|----------------|-----------------------| | 2022 | 4 | EDF feasibility, XML configuration, Gantt‑chart reading | “Assume a zero‑overhead context switch.” | | 2023 | 5 | Rate‑Monotonic vs. Deadline‑Monotonic, partitioned vs. global, utilization bound | “Task set is not harmonic – highlight why RM fails.” | | 2024 | 3 | PFair simulation, speed‑scaling, energy‑aware scheduling | “Processor frequency can be scaled only in multiples of 0.5 GHz.” | | 2025 | 4 | Mixed‑criticality tasks, custom scheduler insertion (Python class) | “Provide only the schedule method; do not edit other files.” | | 2026 | 5 | Multi‑core load balancing, deadline‑miss statistics, statistical confidence interval | “Report the 95 % confidence interval for the average response time.” | simso past paper